Consider two types moral reasoning: Consequentialist and Non-Consequentialist approaches (and the specific theories involved)

Consider two types moral reasoning: Consequentialist and Non-Consequentialist approaches (and the specific theories involved).

Which of these theories, if any, do you find most reasonable, and why?
Provide a clear example to demonstrate your thinking.

In responses to at least two peers, check their work. Were their
explanations and examples clear and accurate? Identify any
problems/errors in their logic or explain why you agree with their
rationale. Make sure your responses are substantive and contribute extra
to the discussion.