Demonstrates effective group processes, i.e., creating vision, forming collaborations, developing consensus, and leading projects.

Community Service Learning Project Description: Demonstrates effective group processes, i.e., creating vision, forming collaborations, developing consensus, and leading projects. Demonstrates acceptable academic / professional standard of writing that correctly utilizes conventions as prescribed by the American Psychological Association. Demonstrates awareness/appreciation of changing organizational status in govt., school, church, family, business, industry, etc. through SWOT analysis. TOTAL POINTS – (total points x 3) Grid View List View Unacceptable Below Standard Acceptable Below Standard Exceptional Cohesion of Created Vision: Demonstrates effective group processes, i.e., creating vision, forming collaborations, developing consensus, and leading projects. Points: 0 (0.00%) Points: 5 (2.50%) Points: 10 (5.00%) Points: 15.4 (7.70%) Points: 5 (2.50%) Level of Collaboration-Demonstrates effective group processes, i.e., creating vision, forming collaborations, developing consensus, and leading projects. Points: 0 (0.00%) Points: 5 (2.50%) Points: 10 (5.00%) Points: 15.4 (7.70%) Points: 5 (2.50%) Degree of Cooperation in Developing Consensus-Demonstrates effective group processes, i.e., creating vision, forming collaborations, developing consensus, and leading projects. Points: 0 (0.00%) Points: 5 (2.50%) Points: 10 (5.00%) Points: 15.4 (7.70%) Points: 5 (2.50%) Caliber of Leadership-Demonstrates effective group processes, i.e., creating vision, forming collaborations, developing consensus, and leading projects. Points: 0 (0.00%) Points: 5 (2.50%) Points: 10 (5.00%) Points: 15.4 (7.70%) Points: 5 (2.50%) Application of Research and Findings-Demonstrates effective group processes, i.e., creating vision, forming collaborations, developing consensus, and leading projects. Points: 0 (0.00%) Points: 5 (2.50%) Points: 10 (5.00%) Points: 15.4 (7.70%) Points: 5 (2.50%) Organization and clarity of material-Demonstrates acceptable academic / professional standard of writing that correctly utilizes conventions as prescribed by the American Psychological Association. Points: 0 (0.00%) Points: 5 (2.50%) Points: 10 (5.00%) Points: 16 (8.00%) Points: 5 (2.50%) Accuracy in technical expression-Demonstrates acceptable academic / professional standard of writing that correctly utilizes conventions as prescribed by the American Psychological Association. Points: 0 (0.00%) Points: 5 (2.50%) Points: 10 (5.00%) Points: 15.4 (7.70%) Points: 5 (2.50%) Use of standard writing conventions-Demonstrates acceptable academic / professional standard of writing that correctly utilizes conventions as prescribed by the American Psychological Association. Points: 0 (0.00%) Points: 5 (2.50%) Points: 10 (5.00%) Points: 15.4 (7.70%) Points: 5 (2.50%) Adherence to APA style-Use of standard writing conventions-Demonstrates acceptable academic / professional standard of writing that correctly utilizes conventions as prescribed by the American Psychological Association. Points: 0 (0.00%) Points: 5 (2.50%) Points: 10 (5.00%) Points: 15.4 (7.70%) Points: 5 (2.50%) Identification of Strengths-Demonstrates awareness/appreciation of changing organizational status in govt., school, church, family, business, industry, etc. through SWAT analysis. Points: 0 (0.00%) Points: 2 (1.00%) Points: 3 (1.50%) Points: 15.4 (7.70%) Points: 5 (2.50%) Identification of Weakness-Demonstrates awareness/appreciation of changing organizational status in govt., school, church, family, business, industry, etc. through SWAT analysis. Points: 0 (0.00%) Points: 2 (1.00%) Points: 3 (1.50%) Points: 15.4 (7.70%) Points: 5 (2.50%) Identification of Opportunity-Demonstrates awareness/appreciation of changing organizational status in govt., school, church, family, business, industry, etc. through SWAT analysis. Points: 0 (0.00%) Points: 2 (1.00%) Points: 3 (1.50%) Points: 15 (7.50%) Points: 5 (2.50%) Identification of Threat-Demonstrates awareness/appreciation of changing organizational status in govt., school, church, family, business, industry, etc. through SWAT analysis. Points: 0 (0.00%) Points: 2 (1.00%) Points: 3 (1.50%) Points: 15 (7.50%) Points: 5 (2.50%) Name:Lead 420 Final Project Rubric Community Analysis Task Force Project or Community Service Learning Project Description:Demonstrates effective group processes, i.e., creating vision, forming collaborations, developing consensus, and leading projects. Demonstrates acceptable academic / professional standard of writing that correctly utilizes conventions as prescribed by the American Psychological Association. Demonstrates awareness/appreciation of changing organizational status in govt., school, church, family, business, industry, etc. through SWOT analysis. TOTAL POINTS – (total points x 3)