Information literacy paper

from books or tv or radio but mostly books or internet

Writing Assignment 1
Writing Assignment 1
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Content (70% possible points)
Paper demonstrates an excellent understanding of the topic. Paper provides significant detail including multiple relevant examples, evidence from the readings and other sources, and discerning ideas.

(63–70%)

Paper demonstrates a good understanding of the topic. Paper includes moderate detail, evidence from the readings, and discerning ideas.

(56–62%)

Paper demonstrates a fair understanding of the topic. Paper may be lacking in detail and specificity and/or may not include sufficient pertinent examples or provide sufficient evidence from the readings.

(49–55%)

Paper demonstrates poor understanding of the topic. Paper is missing details or does not include any pertinent examples or provide sufficient evidence from the readings.

(0–48%)
70 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Writing (30% possible points)
Paper is well organized, uses scholarly tone, follows APA style, uses original writing and proper paraphrasing, contains very few or no writing and/or spelling errors, and is fully consistent with APA writing style. Paper contains multiple appropriate and exemplary sources expected/required for the assignment.

(27–30%)

Paper is mostly consistent with APA writing style. Paper may have some small or infrequent organization, scholarly tone, or APA-style issues, and/or may contain a few writing and spelling errors and/or somewhat less than the expected number of or type of sources.

(24–26%)

Paper may be lacking in organization, scholarly tone, APA style, and/or contain many writings and/or spelling errors or shows moderate reliance on quoting vs. original writing and paraphrasing. Paper may contain inferior resources (number or quality).

(21–23%)

Paper is well below student’s writing style expectations for organization, scholarly tone, APA style, and writing, or it relies excessively on quoting. Paper may contain few or no quality resources.

(0–20%)
30 pts